Jump to content

jpvdveer

Membre Premium
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    104

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by jpvdveer

  1. jpvdveer
    More information about ""
    Magnifique - un grand merci!
  2. jpvdveer
    Great to hear you're back in action. Many thanks for this new update!
  3. jpvdveer
    More information about ""
    Un grand merci en effet pour cet excellent travail. Très convaincant et la végétation est parmi les meilleures que l'on puisse trouver en TS. Bravo!
  4. jpvdveer
    More information about ""
    Un travail superbe - un grand merci! Many thanks!
  5. jpvdveer
    More information about ""
    Un travail superbe - un grand merci! Many thanks!
  6. jpvdveer
    More information about ""
    Super - un grand merci!
  7. jpvdveer
    Even Microsoft itself has ended support for Windows 7 more than two years ago. Security patches are no longer provided, leaving your PC vulnerable to viruses and hacking attempts. You should upgrade to Windows 10 or 11 ASAP, and certainly not be surprised that third parties will not support WIndows 7 either.
  8. jpvdveer
    I think exactly this has been implemented already in one of the most recent updates.
  9. jpvdveer
    Yeah, but I'm talking here about cases where RWE2 declares tasks finished well before TS does. Yesterday I had a stop between 10:40 and 10:45, where the stop in TS lasted until 10:45 (correctly) but where RWE2, for some reason, declared the stop finished at 10:41 already. A rule in RWE2 where tasks cannot be completed in RWE2 if the departure time has not yet been reached would help here.
  10. jpvdveer
    It would indeed be good for this to be given some attention. It happens fairly often, and I believe also in other conditions than the one described above, that RWE2 completes tasks minutes before the actual departure time, resulting in the guard whistle being blown (far) too early. Wouldn't it be possible to impose a simple condition under which a task with departure time of, say, 10:45 can never be completed before that time (or, say, 10 seconds before that, to allow time for the guard whistle)?
  11. jpvdveer
    Yes, but you can configure Windows to accept longer path names. As it happens, I used an installer for an MSFS airplane yesterday, by the leading third-party developer PMDG. MS Flight Simulator has ridiculously long path names (eg C:\Users\Public\AppData\Local\Packages\Microsoft.FlightSimulator_8wekyb334edw\LocalCache\Packages for all third-party content), such that the 256-character imit quickly becomes an issue. That particular installer actually offered to adjust the Windows path name limit, which I took up. Maybe useful.
  12. jpvdveer
    I remember the picture - also had this at some point, years ago But no idea any more how I got there or how I got out of it! I would definitely recommend trying to get used to the RWE2 HUD as this provides you with a much better feel for the train that you are driving!
  13. jpvdveer
    Completely agreed.
  14. jpvdveer
    Nice! [As with all elements of the HUD, it would be nice to be able (eventually) to reduce the size of this, and also to reduce the opacity of this to 0% (such that only the actual speed figure would remain visible and can unobtrusively be put in some unused corner of the screen).]
  15. jpvdveer
    For me, as Dutch native, it is very common (with the Dutch spelling promille). The English term was also new to me, despite having lived in the UK for a number of years. As per Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per_mille Rather than "permile", it may be somewhat clearer to use "per mille", though both ways of spelling the term seem acceptable.
  16. jpvdveer
    Looks good to me. Modding capabilities will be key here - the German community will no doubt step in and provide the actual DB announcements as freeware. (By the way, this discussion may get more traction if a new topic was opened for it on rail-sim.de.)
  17. jpvdveer
    More information about ""
    Magnifique - un grand merci!
  18. jpvdveer
    More information about ""
    Un grand merci! On a aussi besoin de:
  19. jpvdveer
    With the answer being yes I believe - I have it on two machines.
  20. jpvdveer
    Un grand merci!
  21. jpvdveer
    Aussi de ma part un grand merci pour ces sons superbes! [La seule chose que je proposerais de changer - fournir les fichiers dans un dossier Assets, ou fichier .rwp - plus facile à installer]
  22. jpvdveer
    More information about ""
    J'ai maintenant eu l'occasion de tester les sons et je pense qu'ils sont très bons. Je pense qu'il y a juste un petit bug - lorsque le cruise control (vitesse imposée) est activé, le son est momentanément coupé lorsque le régulateur de traction est déplacé d'une position à l'autre (par exemple de 12% à 25%). Ce problème ne se présente pas en roulant manuellement. Sinon super. Encore une fois merci!
  23. jpvdveer
    Sur Dutchsims.nl, une mise à jour des rails pour la LGV Rhône-Alpes & Méditerranée Route a été publiée - voir https://dutchsims.nl/viewtopic.php?f=98&p=5955#p5955. Cela utilise maintenant les rails de Münster - Brême. Cette mise à jour modifie le track.bin de la LGV Rhône-Alpes & Méditerranéee et laisse le dossier Assets inchangé. A ce titre, cette mise à jour ne devrait pas affecter les routes freeware françaises qui utilisent également les rails de LGV Route Rhône-Alpes & Méditerranée. (Comme certains d'entre vous le savent, des problèmes se sont produits avec le Armstrong Powerhouse Track Enhancement Pack.)
  24. jpvdveer
    Je préfère aussi les lignes avec de larges paysages. TS peut être un peu comme un simulateur de vol lorsque la fonction F2 est utilisée, et il n'y a rien de plus immersif que des lignes comme Hausach - Villingen ou la ligne roumaine Valea Oltului (Sibiu - Băbeni). Mais en fin de compte, cela dépend du constructeur d'itinéraire.
  25. jpvdveer
    Ce serait tout à fait magnifique. Les gares de Belfort et Bienne sont superbes! Bon courage pour la suite!
×
×
  • Create New...